Chelsea n’a pas renoncé à conserver Éden Hazard malgré l’intérêt poussé du Real Madrid.
Neymar, Harry Kane, Robert Lewandowski, Eden Hazard, Mauro Icardi… A en croire les différentes rumeurs autour du Real Madrid, les joueurs susceptibles de renforcer les Merengue et d’aider à tourner la page de la BBC sont nombreux. Certaines pistes semblent toutefois plus solides que d’autres.
Si l’arrivée de Neymar, un an seulement après avoir vu le PSG débourser 222 millions d’euros pour le recruter, apparaît illusoire, celle d’Eden Hazard est autrement plus envisageable. Et pas seulement parce qu’à l’instar de Robert Lewandowski, son nom est évoqué depuis plusieurs étés du côté du Real Madrid. Récemment interrogé sur le sujet dans Téléfoot, l’intéressé n’a d’ailleurs pas exclu un départ. “On sait que tout peut aller vite dans le foot comme il peut ne rien se passer. Ça fait quelques années qu’on parle de moi, quand ce n’est pas Paris c’est le Real et quand ce n’est pas le Real, c’est Paris. Mais si je dois changer, je changerai”, a-t-il ainsi affirmé, prenant néanmoins soin d’ajouter “Je suis très heureux à Chelsea” ou encore “je donnerai le maximum pour Chelsea le temps que je serai là.”
If you are nonetheless on the fence: get your favourite earphones, brain down toward a Suitable Get and ask in the direction of plug them into a Zune then an iPod and look at which one particular sounds better in the direction of your self, and which interface generates you smile a lot more. Then you are going to notice which is specifically for yourself.
“I just could not go away your web site prior to suggesting that I really loved the usual info an individual supply for your visitors? Is gonna be back regularly to check out new posts”
If you might be nonetheless on the fence: grab your favored earphones, mind down toward a Least complicated Buy and check with to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and watch which 1 sounds much better towards you, and which interface can make your self smile added. Then you’ll recognize which is right for by yourself.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Peculiar this publish is totaly unrelated to what I used to be searching google for, but it was listed on the first page. I suppose your doing one thing right if Google likes you adequate to put you on the first web page of a non similar search.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.