Avocats de l’Etat auprès de la Crei – Une constitution qui pose problème

[contact-form][contact-field label=”Nom” type=”name” required=”true” /][contact-field label=”E-mail” type=”email” required=”true” /][contact-field label=”Site web” type=”url” /][contact-field label=”Message” type=”textarea” /][/contact-form]

Au moment où les avocats commis par l’Etat dans le cadre de la traque des biens mal acquis courent derrière leurs honoraires, leur constitution pose même problème. La preuve, ces avocats qui avaient fait le déplacement à Paris pour plaider une procédure contre Karim Wade portant sur des immeubles qui lui appartiendraient dans ce pays, ont été déboutés  devant le Tribunal de Grand instance de Paris où le  président de séance leur a fait comprendre qu’ils ne sont pas habilités à se constituer dans cette matière pour le compte de l’Etat du Sénégal. Le juge français avait répondu aux avocats du Sénégal que c’est le parquet de Paris qui représente l’Etat du Sénégal qui n’a pas à constituer d’avocats. 
Avec le mimétisme juridique qui fait que le droit sénégalais soit repris du droit français, dans la traque des biens, c’est au procureur de la Crei et à lui seul de représenter l’Etat  qui n’a pas besoin de recourir à des avocats pour défendre sa cause. De ce qui précède, on comprend pourquoi, l’Etat du Sénégal joue au caméléon pour honorer ses engagements envers ses avocats qui lui réclament des sous, et avec lesquels, il a compris bien après le service effectué qu’il pouvait bien se passer d’eux.

498 Commentaires

  3. “We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.”

  4. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  6. Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  9. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  10. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  11. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  12. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  13. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  14. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  15. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  16. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

« Commentaires plus anciens Commentaires plus récents »

Comments are closed.