Parcelles Assainies – Leurs espoirs reposent désormais sur Papa Sow et Modou Lô

Actuellement, les différents lutteurs des Parcelles assainies qui ont déjà disputé des combats n’ont pas trouvé le bout du tunnel. Il s’agit de Zoss, Garga 2, et Yanda qui ont perdu leurs combats. Des coups durs pour ces champions qui étaient à la porte de l’antichambre des espoirs. Mais l’espoir est toujours permis, et les supporters de cette localité jettent leur dévolu sur Papa Sow et Modou Lô pour espérer retrouver le sourire d’antan. Zoss a ouvert les hostilités avec une défaite face à Siteu, s’ensuit Garga 2 qui a perdu face à Tyson, et le tout dernier Mbeur défait a été Yanda, qui s’est fait battre au propre par le champion de Guédiawaye, Alioune Sèye 2. Des défaites dures à avaler pour lessupporters, car ces champions citésfaisaient partie des espoirs des différentes écuries des Parcelles assainies. Lestrois citésrestent pourtant des lutteurs aguerris et ambitieux, mais ils ne se sont jamais douté que leur combat pouvait débouchersur une défaite. Les parcellois qui avaient placé tout leur espoir sur ces champions vont devoir reporter leur capital-confiance sur les deux autres ténors qui sont aussi de Parcelles. Il s’agit de Modou Lô qui va disputer un combat face à Lac 2 ; même si c’est un combat qui ne sera pas du tout facile pour le Rock, les habitants de Parcelles pensent que leur champion pourra venir à bout du Diato. Puis de Papa Sow, qui va faire face à Ama Baldé. Un combat qui bat les records actuellement avec une communication hors pair. Même si Ama Baldé est très redouté, les parcellois pensent que Papa Sow pourraits’en sortir etse hisser vers le sommet. Ce qui leur fera oublier les récents revers de trois de leurs espoirs. La seule chose qui leur reste à faire, c’est de reposer tous leurs espoirs sur ces deux lutteurs. Les parcellois espèrent voir qui de Modou Lô ou Papa Sow gagnera son duel sans aucune difficulté.

286 Commentaires

  1. I just want to mention I’m beginner to weblog and honestly enjoyed this blog. More than likely I’m going to bookmark your website . You surely have terrific article content. Regards for sharing your website page.

  2. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  3. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  4. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  5. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  6. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  7. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  8. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  9. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  10. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  11. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  12. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  13. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  14. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  15. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

LAISSER UN COMMENTAIRE

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here